Terence Atmane vs Matteo Gigante Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Jun at 01:42 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Atmane vs M. Gigante

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Atmane 1 - 0 Gigante
They have played 3 sets in total, with Terence Atmane winning 2 and Matteo Gigante winning 1. The last match between Terence Atmane and Matteo Gigante was at the Nottingham 2 Challenger, 16-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Terence Atmane getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Atmane | 1 |
| Gigante | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Nottingham 2 Challenger(06-16-25)
T. Atmane vs M. Gigante H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $765,265 | Career Prize Money | $571,445 |
| 60.56% (238-155) | Career Total W/L | 57.68% (169-124) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 6 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 41.18% (7-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (5-5) |
T. Atmane vs M. Gigante Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Atmane edges out Gigante in second serve points won, boasting a win rate of 46.24% compared to Gigante's 44.01%. Is this an indicator of Atmane's slight serve advantage? Yes, it suggests a marginal edge.
- Return Game Stats: Gigante excels in returning, winning 48.62% of opponent's second serve points in recent form, outshining Atmane's 45.19%. On first serve returns, Gigante maintains a lead with 26.59% compared to Atmane's 23.97%.
- Pressure Play: Atmane excels under pressure, saving 62.3% of breakpoints, while Gigante has a 50.51% save rate. Does this suggest Atmane remains steadfast in crucial moments? Indeed, Atmane seems more resilient.
- Overall Performance: Over the last year, Gigante's match win percentage is slightly higher at 57.38% compared to Atmane's 56%. However, both players are comparably strong.
- Preferred Surfaces: Grass suits Gigante, winning 71% of matches, while Hard courts favor Atmane, with a 65% win rate. Interestingly, Atmane struggles on Grass, matching a mere 25% win rate.
- Player Level: At the Challenger/ITF level over the past year, Atmane has a higher win rate of 60.38% versus Gigante's 56.41%. Does Atmane's experience at this level offer an advantage? Possibly, as Atmane has more wins.
- Opponent Quality: Gigante usually faces tougher opponents with an average ranking of 196.8, whereas Atmane competes against a lower average rank of 232.15. Does this indicate Gigante is more challenged? Yes, facing stronger players may boost Gigante's experience.
- Deciding Set Acumen: Gigante shines in three-set matches, conquering 71% of deciding sets, while Atmane stands at 49%. Who is the formidable force in tight matches? Gigante shows superior grit.
- Break Point Conversion: Atmane slightly surpasses Gigante in break point conversion with 33.88% compared to 32.37%. Could this give Atmane a critical edge in tight games? It strengthens their breakpoint potential.
Editorial Prediction (June 16, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the recent performance stats, two patterns emerge: Atmane boasts a slightly better second serve performance and breakpoint conversion rate, which might be crucial in closing out tight games.
However, Gigante excels in return games and has demonstrated significant resilience in deciding sets, indicating a strong capacity to navigate high-pressure scenarios.
Considering these strengths, alongside Gigante's superior record against tougher opponents and preference for grass, the scales seem to tip slightly in Gigante's favor.
Overall, while the competition is closely matched, Gigante's edge in returning and deciding set performance suggests they are most likely to prevail in this upcoming match.
Terence Atmane vs Matteo Gigante Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Atmane vs M. Gigante H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 14 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:57:48 | Average Match Time | 1:57:48 |
| 68% (56/82) | 1st Serve % | 60% (59/98) |
| 79% (44/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (42/59) |
| 54% (14/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (22/39) |
| 15% (2/13) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 35% (34/98) | Return Points Win % | 29% (24/82) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Atmane Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 4-4 ret. | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 5-7 6-0 | ||
M. Gigante Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 4-2 ret. | ||
R2 | L | w/o | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(5) 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q2 | L | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | ||

T. Atmane vs M. Gigante Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.56% (238/155) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.68% (169/124) |
| 58.61% (541/382) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.33% (384/310) |
| 52.64% (4755/4278) | Games Win/Loss | 51.96% (3409/3152) |
| 65.16% (187/100) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.44% (58/28) |
| 55.07% (38/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.26% (96/66) |
| 36.00% (9/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 27.78% (10/26) |
| 33.33% (4/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 55.56% (5/4) |
| 0.52 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 2288 | Aces Total | 934 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1332 | Total Double Faults | 1012 |
| 1:40:25 | Average Match Time | 1:35:50 |
| 381.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 360.6 |
| 59% (16558/27841) | 1st Serve % | 59% (11812/19965) |
| 72% (11940/16558) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (8068/11812) |
| 52% (5866/11283) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4031/8153) |
| 42% (1012/2386) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (920/2128) |
| 38% (10330/27294) | Return Points Win % | 41% (8280/20212) |
| 40.00% (6/9) | Slam W/L | 57.69% (15/11) |
| 57.58% (19/14) | Masters W/L | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 42.86% (15/20) | Main Tour W/L | 18.18% (2/9) |
| 62.16% (92/56) | Challenger W/L | 57.07% (109/82) |
| 65.43% (106/56) | Futures W/L | 72.55% (37/14) |
| 61% (234/383) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (164/281) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 59% (91/155) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (51/91) |
| 53% (74/140) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (59/103) |
| 86% (243/209) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (173/137) |
| 14% (243/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (173/34) |
| 20% (148/29) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (120/30) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Sonay Kartal vs Jessica Pieri Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 8th December 2025 Best Bets

Open BLS de Limoges – Limoges Preview And Prediction: Anhelina Kalinina vs Kathinka Von Deichmann Betting Tips & Picks December 8, 2025

Kamilla Rakhimova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 6th December 2025 Best Bets

Open In Arte Angers Loire – Angers Preview And Prediction: Tamara Korpatsch vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Betting Tips & Picks December 6, 2025

Alycia Parks vs Tamara Korpatsch Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 5th December 2025 Best Bets
